California Employment Law Blog

ABC Test Classifying Workers as Independent Contractors Applies Retroactively

Posted by Timothy B. Del Castillo | Feb 11, 2021 | 0 Comments

scrabble pieces

Recently, the California Supreme Court answered the long-awaited question as to whether the ABC test set forth in Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) (“Dynamex”) to classify workers as independent contractors applies retroactively.  The answer is yes.  In Vasquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (“Vasquez”), the court ruled that the ABC test applies retroactively to all cases not yet final as of April 30, 2018 when the decision in Dynamexwas issued.

The ABC test was discussed in depth in a prior blog post.  In essence, the test requires a hiring entity to prove allof the following in order to classify a worker as an independent contractor: (1) the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in fact and in contract; (2) the worker performs work outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and (3) the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business in the work he or she performs.  The court's decision in Dynamex was significant because it departed greatly from longstanding precedent established in S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) (“Borello”) where the court set forth several factors to consider when determining independent contractor status.  Rather than a hiring entity having to prove any one factor, the factors were considered as a whole, either weighing in favor of or against independent contractor status.  After Dynamex, a hiring entity has to prove each and every element of the ABC test in order to classify a worker as an independent contractor. 

In determining that the ABC test applies retroactively, the court in Vasquez reasoned that its decision in Dynamexdid not change an established rule of law on which the parties had relied.   According to the court, Dynamex addressed an issue of first impression—how the “suffer or permit to work” definition under the Industrial Welfare Commission's (“IWC”) wage orders applies to distinguish between independent contractors and employees.  The court noted that its decision in Borello addressed the issue of whether a worker was an independent contractor or an employee under the workers' compensation statutes, not under the IWC's wage orders.  Because no prior decision specifically answered the question addressed in Dynamex, the court found no reason to depart from the general rule that judicial decisions have retroactive effect.

Significance of the Court's Decision

The decision in Vasquez limits the ability for hiring entities and workers to craft the terms of their business relationships.  Given the retroactive nature of the ABC test, employers should be prepared for a potential wave of litigation involving independent contractor classifications prior to April 2018.  Employers should work closely with experienced employment counsel to ensure independent contractor classifications comply with the law.

About the Author

Timothy B. Del Castillo

Tim Del Castillo is Founding Partner of Castle Law: California Employment Counsel, PC.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment


There is no charge for the initial phone consultation. Fill out the contact form on the website with detailed information about your circumstances and we will schedule a telephone appointment.