California Employment Law Blog

Are Realtors Still Independent Contractors After Dynamex?

Posted by Timothy B. Del Castillo | Oct 26, 2018 | 0 Comments

house falling off building

As legal observers will recall, earlier this year, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion that changed the legal landscape for independent contractors in California.  One major impact of the Dynamex decision that is likely to be heavily litigated is how the new standard applies to the Golden State's thousands of independent contractor real estate agents.   

Dynamex's ABC Test

As a reminder, under the new Dynamex "ABC" standard:

[A] worker is properly considered an independent contractor to whom a wage order does not apply only if the hiring entity establishes: (A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact; (B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and (C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity.

This test places the burden on the employer.  All workers are now deemed to be employees of the company unless the employer can establish all three requirements.

The Impact on Real Estate Agents

The “ABC” test now makes it very difficult for real estate agents to be deemed independent contractors.  Part (B) of the test requires that the worker performs work outside the usual scope of the business.  Real estate firms are in the business of marketing and selling property and real estate agents are typically in the business of marketing and selling property.  The agent's work is inside the usual course of the firm's business.  Control, part (A), is another factor that will impact the analysis in many cases.  For these reasons, some have referred to Dynamex as "zombie apocalypse time in the real estate industry."

Others have argued that real estate agents remain properly classified as independent contractors even after Dynamex because California Business and Professions Code section 10032 authorizes an independent contractor relationship between an agent and a real estate firm.  That statute, however, was not intended to address employment relationships but a "broker's vicarious liability for a salesperson's tortious acts," and courts have still applied common law tests to the employment relationship. Claver v. Coldwell Banker, Case No. 08cv817-L(AJB) (S.D. Cal. March 25, 2009).  Moreover, section 10032 does not state that real estate agents are necessarily independent contractors.  And it does not have an impact on the wage orders, where Dynamex controls.

Lobbying efforts to create a legislative exception for the real estate industry are anticipated.  Given the political climate in California, such an exception seems unlikely.  Stay tuned to see how the real estate industry addresses this potentially massive shift.   

About the Author

Timothy B. Del Castillo

Tim practices employment law in California and represents both employees and employers in federal and state courts, administrative hearings, arbitrations, mediations, and in direct negotiations. Tim also offers advice and counsel and training to businesses to help them achieve compliance with California employment laws.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

QUALITY REPRESENTATION FROM A TRUSTED ADVISOR.

Castle Law’s goal is to become your trusted advisor and to provide real value for all of your employment law needs. To become our client’s trusted advisors, we aim to provide quality representation and sound advice time and again.

FREE CONSULTATION.

There is no charge for the initial phone consultation. Attorney Tim Del Castillo will personally speak with you about your case and provide you with an honest analysis. Fill out the contact form on the website with detailed information about your circumstances and we will schedule a telephone appointment.

Copyright © 2018 Tim Del Castillo

Attorney Timothy B. Del Castillo is responsible for the content on this website, which may contain an advertisement. The information on this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and no attorney-client relationship is formed until conflicts have been cleared and both parties have signed a written fee agreement. Please do not send any confidential information through the website. The materials and information on this website are for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE OUTCOMES. Any testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

Menu