California Employment Law Blog

AB 2751: The Implications of California's Proposed "Right to Disconnect" Bill

Posted by Timothy B. Del Castillo | Apr 08, 2024 | 0 Comments

The digital era has significantly blurred the lines between professional and personal life, leading to a global reevaluation of labor laws to better serve the modern workforce's needs. In California, a new legislative effort, Assembly Bill (AB) 2751, introduced by Assemblyman Matt Haney, aims to enshrine a "right to disconnect" for workers. This bill reflects an international trend toward safeguarding employees' off-hours, but it also prompts a careful examination of its broader implications.

At its core, AB 2751 requires California employers to clearly articulate an employee's working hours, intending to shield them from the obligation of handling work-related communications after hours. Furthermore, it mandates that conditions requiring salaried employees to work beyond these hours be precisely outlined in their contracts, with only emergency situations as permissible exceptions. The Department of Labor is designated to monitor compliance, with a starting fine of $100 for violations.

The bill's primary goal is its potential to foster an improved work-life balance, aiming to alleviate the mental and physical toll of constant connectivity. By legally codifying the right to disconnect, AB 2751 aims to mitigate worker burnout and stress, promising a healthier, more productive workforce.

However, critics of AB 2751 argue that the bill may introduce inflexible work schedules, complicating the dynamic needs of industries reliant on fluid working hours or swift responses. The legislation's stringent demands could thus impede business adaptability and responsiveness to market or operational emergencies.

There's also concern that the bill, in its mission to protect employees, might inadvertently restrict their ability to balance work with personal life flexibly. The prohibition against after-hours work communications could negate the benefits of flexible scheduling that some workers and industries currently enjoy, suggesting a one-size-fits-all approach that may not work for everybody.

As AB 2751 makes its way through the legislative process, its supporters and critics alike acknowledge its intent to prevent worker burnout but caution against potential unintended consequences. The challenge lies in crafting a law that protects workers' rights to disconnect without stifling employer and employee flexibility. As AB 2751 progresses through California's legislature this year, we will be sure to provide updates on this significant new piece of legislation.

About the Author

Timothy B. Del Castillo

Tim Del Castillo is Founding Partner of Castle Law: California Employment Counsel, PC.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment


There is no charge for the initial phone consultation. Fill out the contact form on the website with detailed information about your circumstances and we will schedule a telephone appointment.