California Employment Law Blog

Ignorance Is Not Bliss: Court of Appeal Holds that Knowledge and Intent Are Not Required For PAGA Penalties

Posted by Timothy B. Del Castillo | Sep 27, 2017 | 0 Comments

Picture of front of court building

The California Court of Appeal issued a published opinion yesterday regarding what plaintiffs must prove to recover penalties for deficient wage statements under the Private Attorney General Act ("PAGA").  

In Lopez v. Friant , the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer.  It was undisputed that the wage statements failed to include employees' employee identification numbers or the last four digits of their social security numbers, as required under Labor Code section 226(a)(7).  Nonetheless, the trial court granted summary judgment for the employer because the Plaintiff failed to prove that the omission was "knowing and intentional."  The employer didn't know the wage statements were missing information.

The Court of Appeal reversed.  The Court explained that although Labor Code section 226(e)(1) requires a knowing and intentional violation before an employee may recover a statutory penalty under section 226, statutory penalties are distinct from civil penalties that may be recovered by an aggrieved employee on behalf of the state through a PAGA cause of action. Because the Plaintiff was seeking only civil penalties under PAGA, no showing of knowledge and intent was required.  In short, it was irrelevant that the employer did not know its wage statements were deficient; it was still liable for penalties under PAGA.  

The Court of Appeal's decisions is consistent with Federal District Court decisions that have addressed PAGA wage statement penalties.  Now the issue is settled for purposes of state law, unless and until the California Supreme Court decides to take it up.  Don't hold your breath.  

About the Author

Timothy B. Del Castillo

Tim practices employment law in California and represents both employees and employers in federal and state courts, administrative hearings, arbitrations, mediations, and in direct negotiations. Tim also offers advice and counsel and training to businesses to help them achieve compliance with California employment laws.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment


Castle Law’s goal is to become your trusted advisor and to provide real value for all of your employment law needs. To become our client’s trusted advisors, we aim to provide quality representation and sound advice time and again.


There is no charge for the initial phone consultation. Fill out the contact form on the website with detailed information about your circumstances and we will schedule a telephone appointment.

Copyright © 2020 Castle Law: California Employment Counsel

Attorney Timothy B. Del Castillo is responsible for the content on this website, which may contain an advertisement. The information on this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and no attorney-client relationship is formed until conflicts have been cleared and both parties have signed a written fee agreement. Please do not send any confidential information through the website. The materials and information on this website are for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE OUTCOMES. Any testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.